Siemens facing scrutiny over Western Sahara wind project
Responsible Investor - Siemens, the German industrial giant, is facing scrutiny from environmental, social and governance (ESG) research house GES Investment Services over a wind farm project in the disputed Western Sahara.
Siemens, the German industrial giant, is facing scrutiny from environmental, social and governance (ESG) research house GES Investment Services over a wind farm project in the disputed Western Sahara region of Morocco.
Following media reports, GES is looking to see whether the project violates the human rights of the indigenous Saharawi people.
Under a deal with Nareva Holding, the renewables and energy arm of Moroccan industrial and financial group ONA, Siemens is installing a total of 44 wind turbines, with 100MW capacity, at two sites in Morocco.
The first is at Haouma, 30km from Tangiers. The other is at Foum El Oued in the disputed southern part of the country.
Yet according to a report in News Times Africa, the indigenous Saharawis did not sanction the latter project, as is required by international law.
“Nareva has no right to strike deals in our illegally occupied land because it is dealing in something that it does not own,” the report quoted Abba Malainin from the Western Sahara liberation front, Polisario, is saying.
It has prompted GES, which advises several big Scandinavian pension funds, to investigate Siemens’ role in the projects.
“A central question is whether the activity is in line with the interests, needs and wishes of the people of Western Sahara,” said GES Senior Engagement Manager Tytti Kaasinen. The wind farms are being developed under the Clean Development Mechanism, which has faced criticism in the past over abuses of land and human rights.
“The fact that the deal involves renewable energy does not mean that it is automatically good for the local people, if they accrue no benefits from it or are against such activity on their land,” Kaasinen added. GES will now seek more details from the company.
Contacted by Responsible Investor, Siemens insisted the project was fully legal. “It does not infringe on the rights of self-determination or any other human rights in public international law,” the German firm said in a statement.
Siemens also pointed to the many benefits of the project, saying it would reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the Western Sahara while providing new technology, economic development and, indirectly, jobs for the local population.
Investors, for example the giant Norwegian Government Pension Fund, have excluded mining companies FMC Corp. and Canada’s Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan over their involvement in the Western Sahara.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.