5 February 2015 Brussels To the attention of Richard Downey Vice President, Investor/Corporate Relations and Market Research
Request for comments - Pending report on Agrium’s phosphate imports from occupied Western Sahara
Dear Mr Downey,
Western Sahara Resource Watch is again privileged to write to you. This letter is about Agrium Inc’s phosphate imports from occupied Western Sahara in 2014.
Our research demonstrates that your company received some 14 shipments of phosphate from the Bou Craa mine in Western Sahara. We have determined those shipments totaled about 779,000 tonnes, making Agrium the largest importer of phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara for the calendar year 2014.
In the coming weeks, WSRW will publish a follow-up report to its “P for Plunder” report of 2014. The revised edition of the report will offer information about the importing companies, and about the estimated volume and market value of the imports. Given the estimated size of Agrium’s imports, the company will surely be featured in that report.
We would be grateful if, before this February 12, Agrium Inc. can clarify the following matters:
1. Is it correct that Agrium received (at the Port of Vancouver) 14 shipments of phosphate from occupied Western Sahara during 2014, amounting to approximately 779,000 tonnes? 2. What steps, if any, has Agrium taken to assure itself of the continuing consent of the Saharawi people to such purchases, consistent their right to self-determination, the 2002 UN Legal Opinion (S/2002/161) and international humanitarian law?
As we have noted in earlier letters, we maintain that it is not in Agrium’s interest to be associated with colonialism, an illegal occupation, grave human rights violations and impermissible resource exploitation in Western Sahara. By refraining from importing until the status of the territory has been settled, your company will help to create the circumstances that will allow the people of Western Sahara to freely and fairly determine their political future, as is their right under international law. Others, of course, have done this, and numerous investors continue to give up or refrain from acquiring share interests in the few remaining companies involved in the trade.
Please let us know if our questions above are not clear, or if you require additional information to respond to them. WSRW looks forward to hearing from you.
Sara Eyckmans International Coordinator Western Sahara Resource Watch
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.