Polisario calls on EU to halt all trade talks covering Western Sahara
Article image
An official of the Western Sahara liberation movement Frente Polisario expresses satisfaction of the opinion issued today by the top lawyer in the Court of Justice of European Union.
Published 10 January 2018


Photo: UN/Devra Berkowitz

Today, the Advocate General of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) issued an opinion on a court case between the Western Sahara Campaign UK and British authorities, which had been referred to the CJEU.

His opinion was that the EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement is invalid as it includes the territory of Western Sahara. This is great news for the national liberation movement.

“We have always stated that this agreement is illegal. And now, we have a very solid legal support on that from top lawyer in the Court on this issue. We are very satisfied”, Mhamed Khadad stated, coordinator of the Polisario Front to the UN Mission for Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO).

“The opinion is clear in defining that Morocco is occupying Western Sahara and that international humanitarian law must apply. It can’t be clearer”, he said.

Khadad stated that his organization awaits with anticipation the final judgment of the Court in a few months.
“Now, we are calling the EU to draw the necessary conclusion and to enter into negotiation with the legal representatives of the territory on any exploration of natural resources of the territory. This includes the new fisheries agreement talks that were announced by the Commission yesterday”, Khadad stated.

Khadad also calls on all businesses operating under Moroccan contracts in Western Sahara “to withdraw from the territory and enter into talks with Polisario".

"We are open and ready to engage in discussion with all who are interested in the resources of Western Sahara, including the EU. But it has to be based on international law”, he stated.

Finally, Khadad expressed his confidence in the European rule of law, “many times we have been disappointed by European politicians, but we never lost our faith in justice”, he stated.

There are currently two similar court cases ongoing in the Court of Justice of the EU. One – which the Advocate-General now pronounced his opinion on – was referred to the court from the UK High Court, where the Western Sahara Campaign UK had initiated a legal case against the British government on the matter.

In addition, and most importantly, Polisario has its own legal case against the European Council, which will be addressed by the Court later this year. Polisario already won a massive moral victory in the Court in 2016 when it found EU agreements in Western Sahara to be invalid unless it had obtained consent from the representatives of the territory.

EU Commission backtracks on labelling Western Sahara goods

What is EU's position on labelling of products from occupied Western Sahara? The EU Commission has now for the third time published a response to a parliamentary question on the matter, but the latest version fails to address the question.

18 March 2020

Why does this EU statement keep disappearing?

A clarification by the EU Commission on labelling of products from Western Sahara was published, then removed, then published again and has now been removed again from EU websites. 

21 February 2020

EU reaffirms: Western Sahara products to be labelled as such

Two weeks ago, the EU Commission announced that products from Western Sahara should be labelled accordingly, only to withdraw that statement the very next day. Today, the Commission reaffirms its original position.

19 February 2020

Spectacular backtracking by EU Commission on Western Sahara labelling

On 5 February 2020, the EU Commission announced that products from Western Sahara should be labelled accordingly. But about 24 hours later, all traces to that statement had been removed from EU websites.

10 February 2020