Why WSRW refuses to take part in the EU's Western Sahara consultation
The EU's foreign affairs department has invited WSRW to take part in a consultation process regarding EU-Morocco trade talks covering Western Sahara. Though in principle always open to dialogue, WSRW had to decline.
Published: 07.02 - 2018 12:05Printer version    
"Western Sahara Resource Watch wishes to maintain a close dialogue with all EU institutions and Member States, as we have done in the last decade. We will also continue to do so in the future. However, for the first time ever, we have turned down a proposed meeting with the EU's External Action Service (EU)", chair of Western Sahara Resource Watch, Sylvia Valentin clarifies.

Valentin explained that these are exceptional circumstances. WSRW is concerned by the lack of clarity on the purpose of the meeting, considering that an agreement with Morocco has already been initialed, and that the representative body of the people of Western Sahara has not been invited to formally discuss whether they consent to a trade agreement that covers the territory of Western Sahara.  

"As a matter of transparency, WSRW wants to publish its correspondence to the EEAS explaining why we could not accept the invitation", Valentin states.

Find the latest mail from WSRW to the EEAS below, sent 5 February 2018


Thank you for your reply. We very much appreciate your invitation, yet regretfully, we will have to decline. Please allow us to elaborate – as we presume that in the spirit of consultation, we can at least state our reservations.

While the exercise of consulting concerned stakeholders is laudable, we fail to see the purpose of such a process given the current state-of-affairs.

The Court of Justice of the European Union established in its judgment of 21 December 2016 that consent of the representatives of the people of the territory must be obtained. From what we understand, the negotiations with the Government of Morocco are now finished, and the agreed text has been initialed. The Government of Morocco does not represent the people of the territory. It is clear that no consent has been received, as the Court required. We do not see the point of any consultation on a deal that lacks the approval of the people of the territory. On that, we refer to the letter of Saharawi CSOs unanimously condemning the EEAS and Commission’s approach thus far.

That this process is supposedly centered on “the socio-economic development of the people living in Western Sahara” is furthermore remarkable, as that line of argumentation was found to be invalid by the Court. Article 106 underscores that there is no need to determine the benefits of the implementation of an agreement – what is important is that the people of the territory have consented to it. Please also note the difference between the concepts of the people of the territory – the original inhabitants - versus the people living in the territory; at present that consists of a large majority of Moroccans that were attracted to locate to Western Sahara by financial and economic incentives created by the Moroccan government.

WSRW does not want to contribute to what appears to be an attempt to legitimize a process whereby an agreement covering a territory’s resources is initialed with a Government that has no legal claim to the territory, without as much as asking the people of that territory whether they agree or not at an appropriate time: namely before the start of the negotiation process.

Accordingly, as it stands, we will respectfully have to decline. Should the EEAS and Commission consider an approach that is in line with the people of Western Sahara’s right to self-determination and in respect of their right to consent, we will be happy to meet.

Kind regards,
Sara Eyckmans



Since you're here....
WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.

    
News:

15.02 - 2018 / 15.02 - 2018Sweden to vote against new EU-Morocco fish talks
08.02 - 2018 / 08.02 - 2018Studies continue on Kosmos Energy's block
07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Kosmos and Cairn have pulled out of Western Sahara
07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Why WSRW refuses to take part in the EU's Western Sahara consultation
03.02 - 2018 / 03.02 - 2018Unison condemnation of the EU Commission from Western Sahara groups
02.02 - 2018 / 01.02 - 2018Siemens fails to respond Western Sahara question at AGM
01.02 - 2018 / 01.02 - 2018EU has sealed Western Sahara trade deal in violation of Court Judgment
31.01 - 2018 / 30.01 - 2018Polisario threatens compensation from EU and companies, warns Nutrien
31.01 - 2018 / 30.01 - 2018Vigeo Eiris reports untruly about UN human rights approval
29.01 - 2018 / 29.01 - 2018'Biggest importer' of phosphate rock is pulling out
27.01 - 2018 / 27.01 - 2018Senior socialist MEPs publicly slam EU-Morocco talks
23.01 - 2018 / 12.01 - 2018Glencore has left occupied Western Sahara
22.01 - 2018 / 22.01 - 2018German government not supportive of business in Western Sahara
15.01 - 2018 / 15.01 - 2018Denmark accepts continued EU fisheries in occupied waters
10.01 - 2018 / 10.01 - 2018EU Court advocate: Fish agreement invalid for including Western Sahara
08.01 - 2018 / 08.01 - 2018EU Commission eying new fish deal including Western Sahara
07.01 - 2018 / 07.01 - 2018Nutrien: The new giant on conflict minerals
20.12 - 2017 / 12.12 - 2017EU Commission visited occupied Western Sahara to authorize exporters
07.12 - 2017 / 07.12 - 2017Siemens: the Moroccan king's wind turbine supplier in Western Sahara
05.12 - 2017 / 13.11 - 2017EU fish support to Morocco builds Western Sahara fish industry




EN ES FR DE AR

Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!

tn_court_photo_gdeim_izik_610.jpg

Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch

tn_sjovik_demo_610.jpg

Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder

tn_poweringplunder_eng_610.jpg

At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.
The Western Sahara oil curse

tn_san_leon_protest_camps_8_august_2015_610x200.jpg

Big oil’s interest in occupied Western Sahara has taken a dramatic turn for the worse. Some companies are now drilling, in complete disregard of international law and the Saharawi people’s rights. Here’s what you need to know.

WSRW.org News Archive 2017
WSRW.org News Archive 2016
WSRW.org News Archive 2015
WSRW.org News Archive 2014
WSRW.org News Archive 2013
WSRW.org News Archive 2012
WSRW.org News Archive 2011
WSRW.org News Archive 2010
WSRW.org News Archive 2009
WSRW.org News Archive 2008
WSRW.org News Archive 2007
WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006


Register for our English newsletter:









These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy