In the motion, "the Danish Parliament discourages the engagement of public institutions in, and the purchase of goods from, disputed territories such as Western Sahara, and further urges Danish companies to exercise due vigilance, unless such transactions are known to benefit the local population".
Companies must comply, says Minister
During the debate that preceded the vote, Danish Minister of Foreign Affairs Kristian Jensen said he would talk to Danish companies to ensure that they know of the motion and the position the Danish parliament has now taken on Western Sahara.
“We want Danish companies to know and comply with the laws that are adopted by the Danish parliament. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs will contact organisations, such as the Confederation of Danish Industry, to brief them on the Danish government and parliament’s position on Western Sahara”, Kristian Jensen said during the parliamentary debate that preceded the vote.
Kristian Jensen also said that the Danish government supports and will act on one of the other issues mentioned in the motion, that of the UN’s peacekeeping mission in Western Sahara, MINURSO, being given a mandate to monitor and protect human rights in Western Sahara.
The risk of war
Six Danish MPs from different parties had proposed the motion and initiated the parliamentary debate, that ended with all Danish parties, from the socialist Red-Green Alliance to the anti-immigration Danish People’s Party, voting for the motion.
According to Red-Green Alliance MP Christian Juhl, who was one of the MPs who had proposed the motion, there have been many developments in regard to the Western Sahara conflict in recent years that had compelled them to propose the motion.
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.
Big oil’s interest in occupied Western Sahara has taken a dramatic turn for the worse. Some companies are now drilling, in complete disregard of international law and the Saharawi people’s rights. Here’s what you need to know.