Polisario initiates new law suit against EU-Morocco fish deal
cjeu_building.jpg

On 15 June 2018, Polisario announced that a new case has been launched regarding the EU-Morocco plans to cooperate on fisheries in the waters of occupied Western Sahara. In the EU-Morocco talks, the EU has so far ignored the two judgments from EU Court of Justice on Western Sahara.
Published: 18.06 - 2018 16:50Printer version    
In its press release, national liberation movement of Western Sahara, Polisario Front, announces it has asked the EU Court of Justice (CJEU) to annul the Council Decision of 16 April 2018, authorising the EU Commission to renegotiate the Fisheries Protocol with Morocco. Find the summary of the application submitted by Polisario here.

"Carried out within the framework of the annexation policy of the Kingdom of Morocco, these negotiations violate the right to self-determination of the people of Western Sahara, and their related rights. They will only lead to a new illegal agreement", Polisario's press release of 15 June stated.

The current Protocol, allowing EU vessels to fish in the “Moroccan fishing zones” in return for an annual €30 million, will expire mid-July.

On 27 February this year, the CJEU ruled that the Fisheries Agreement between the EU and Morocco was only valid insofar as it was applied to Morocco, and thus could not be applied to Western Sahara. Western Sahara, the Court stated, does not fall under Moroccan “sovereignty or “jurisdiction”, and is not part of “Moroccan fishing zones” – a notion used throughout the Agreement and its implementing Protocols.

The EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement has been in place since 2006, but gets implemented through Protocols which are up for renegotiation every four years.

In spite of the CJEU judgment, the EU Commission sought a mandate from the EU Member States to open talks with Morocco for both a new Agreement and a new Protocol that would explicitly apply to Western Sahara and its maritime zone. The Member States in Council agreed on 16 April this year that the EU Commission ought to negotiate an amendment to the Agreement so as to include the waters of Western Sahara in its territorial scope, and a new Protocol as the current one is close to expiring.

geographical_use_of_sectoral_support_14-18_300.jpgBy the EU Commission's admission in Court, 91.5% of the EU's fishing activities under the Fisheries Protocol with Morocco take place in the maritime zone of Western Sahara and 66% of the sectoral support under the Protocol goes to Moroccan projects in the occupied territory. The map to the right was included in the evaluation report of the current EU-Morocco Protocol, and demonstrates that Morocco invested the lion's share of EU-support in Western Sahara. Click the map for a larger version.

Polisario's new case is brought only a few days after the EU Commission's adoption of an Exchange of Letters with Morocco that allows for the explicit inclusion of Western Sahara in the EU-Morocco Trade Protocols. The EU Commission argues that this amendment to the Trade Protocols is sufficient to ensure their lawful application to Western Sahara. In December 2016, however, the CJEU had ruled that no EU Trade or Association Agreement could be applied to Western Sahara, unless with the consent of the people of the territory. The proposal of the EU Commission - which still requires approval of both the EU Member States and the EU Parliament - does not have the consent of the people of Western Sahara. The Commission tries to obscure the lack of consent by providing misleading information, claiming that the UN-recognised representation of the people of Western Sahara, took part in a consultation exercise on the proposal.

Morocco has illegally occupied a larger part of the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara since the mid 1970s.


Since you're here....
WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.



    

Top
News:

12.10 - 2020 / 12.10 - 2020Russian fisheries still absent from Western Sahara
07.10 - 2020 / 07.10 - 2020West African controversial fish imports resume
05.10 - 2020 / 02.10 - 2020LATEST: No more Swedish supplies to the Bou Craa mine
08.09 - 2020 / 16.06 - 2020Soon 10 years of wrongful imprisonment: release Gdeim Izik group now
08.09 - 2020 / 07.09 - 2020DHL: ignoring Saharawi rights for 5 parcels a day
24.08 - 2020 / 24.08 - 2020Concrete plans for third solar plant in occupied Western Sahara
10.08 - 2020 / 18.07 - 2020Voltalia to construct wind farm in occupied Western Sahara
28.07 - 2020 / 22.07 - 2020Will Deutsche Post's AGM provide clarity on Western Sahara operations?
27.07 - 2020 / 01.07 - 2020New Indian construction company in occupied Western Sahara
27.07 - 2020 / 20.07 - 2020Continental still unclear about future supplies to Western Sahara
22.07 - 2020 / 22.06 - 2020Conflict Bitcoin miner keeps silent on Dakhla wind farm plans
19.07 - 2020 / 13.07 - 2020Siemens yet again evades questions on Western Sahara
16.07 - 2020 / 29.06 - 2020Namibia slams Spain for failing to respect Saharawi rights
03.07 - 2020 / 02.07 - 2020Swiss supermarkets ban produce from occupied Western Sahara
03.07 - 2020 / 11.06 - 2020HeidelbergCement cites local benefits, ignores consent
02.07 - 2020 / 21.06 - 2020Fishmeal: German government data confirms import controversy
26.06 - 2020 / 21.06 - 2020Turkey: biggest funder of occupation of Western Sahara
25.06 - 2020 / 05.05 - 2020These are the vessels that provide fuel for the occupation
23.06 - 2020 / 22.06 - 2020Protesters set up roadblock to stop conflict minerals in New Zealand
13.06 - 2020 / 13.06 - 2020WSRW urges shareholders to challenge Continental




EN ES FR DE AR

Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies

tn_law_hammer.jpg

It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the five different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch

tn_sjovik_demo_610.jpg

Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.

WSRW.org News Archive 2020
WSRW.org News Archive 2019
WSRW.org News Archive 2018
WSRW.org News Archive 2017
WSRW.org News Archive 2016
WSRW.org News Archive 2015
WSRW.org News Archive 2014
WSRW.org News Archive 2013
WSRW.org News Archive 2012
WSRW.org News Archive 2011
WSRW.org News Archive 2010
WSRW.org News Archive 2009
WSRW.org News Archive 2008
WSRW.org News Archive 2007
WSRW.org News Archive 2004-2006


Register for our English newsletter:









These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy