WSRW questions EEAS about fake consultation on Western Sahara
On 20 January, the EU Commission briefed the Parliament on the negotiations with Morocco to secure Western Sahara trade flows, and the EU External Action Service (EEAS) provided an update on a so-called consultation process. But why is there a consultation process? And with who is the EEAS talking?
The UN is clear that the representative of the people of Western Sahara is the Polisario Front. So what then, when the Court of Justice in its 21 December 2016 judgment states that EU-Morocco trade cannot include the territory of Western Sahara without first obtaining the consent from the representatives of the territory?
The EU's approach has consisted in four stages.
First, it concluded the negotiations with Morocco already on 31 January 2018 before starting any consent process. Second, it has replaced the concept of 'prior consent' with 'post consult'. Thirdly, it has made a primarily "Moroccan" selection of groups to consult. Fourthly, it namedrops an encounter with Polisario, in which the latter clearly condemned the EU practices, as if Polisario had been invited for the purpose of being consulted.
This gives the impression that the EU is engaged in a wide stakeholder consultation dialogue, in which even Polisario is included. In the hearing in the Parliament on 20 February, the Head of the Maghreb Division of the EU External Action Service (EEAS) clarified which groups the EEAS was in dialogue with. The below comment was made by the EEAS official during the 20 January meeting (bold emphasis by Western Sahara Resource Watch).
Based on the presentation by the EEAS, WSRW sent them a letter today, containing 17 questions. See that letter here.
Western Sahara Resource Watch on 5 February 2018 told the EEAS that it regrettfully would not take part in a meeting it had been invited to, as we did not want to contribute to an apparent attempt to legitimize a negotiation process that completely disregards the right to consent of the people of Western Sahara.Statement by Mr. Vincent Piket, Head of the Maghreb Division in the EU External Action Service, in the INTA Committee, 20 February 2018
“Thank you very much, indeed. The Council Secretariat has sent to the Parliament the negotiation mandate, so you will have read in that what Member States expect the Commission and the External Action Service to provide. As regards the involvement of the people concerned by the amendment, the involvement procedure of the people concerned has started. We have set out a program of meetings that is taking place both in Rabat and in Brussels. We have selected for that purpose a list of interlocutors that is very wide-ranging, very diversified. There are Members of Parliament in there, there are members of the regional councils from Western Sahara, we have socio-economic stakeholders in our list of interlocutors; the Chambers of Commerce, Fisheries and Agriculture Chambers particularly from venues inside Western Sahara, Dakhla and El Aaiun in particular. Research institutes, we have economic operators and the development agency of Western Sahara. And a third category is civil society organisations in the strictest sense, focusing on human rights, particularly human rights of the Saharawi people. We have quite a variety of them. All organisations are registered in Morocco, that was one condition for us: to be able to speak to registered organisations. But we have a very broad spectrum there. Both organisations that are politically neutral so to say, as well as organisations, NGO organisations that are very supportive of Polisario. I mention Polisario: Polisario is also in our list of interlocutors and we met with them early in February. Now the work is not yet done. We are let’s say roughly halfway, maybe more than that, in our meetings, and we hope to conclude them by the end of this month. And we hope to have gotten on that basis a very reliable insight into how the people concerned by the agreement in Western Sahara feel about this amendment: whether they see the benefit of it or not, in the economic or socio-economic sense, and whether there are any other objections to it, or other kinds of support for it. So the findings of our meetings will be laid down in the report that the Commission will be sending to the Council and to Parliament, together with the official amendment proposal. So I will not go into the content of that just yet because the exercise is still ongoing. Lastly I should say that the Moroccan authorities on their side will also be conducting a consultation exercise. The government is going to ask for a vote on the amendment in two levels: first of all in the external relations committee of the House of Representatives on a national level, and secondly, they’re going to call for votes in the regional councils of Western Sahara. That’s councils that look more at the regional, local interest. By holding those votes, the government of Morocco will – in their report on that – itemize in particular the voting behavior of the Saharawi people both at the level of the national assembly as well as at the level of the regional councils, in order indeed to be able to see the level of support for this amendment of that particular group of MPs and deputies. Thank you.”
Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.