The European Parliament today approved a new EU-Morocco trade agreement for Western Sahara, without having asked the people of Western Sahara whether they want it. "A sad day for democracy and those who believe in rule of law", WSRW comments.
In the afternoon of 16 January 2019, the European Parliament approved that a new trade deal between the EU and Morocco shall be applied to Western Sahara.
The people of Western Sahara has not given its consent, including the UN-recognised representative of the Saharawis, the national liberation movement Polisario.
The Court of Justice of the EU on 21 December 2016 had ruled that it would violate EU law to enter into include the territory of Western Sahara into a trade agreement with Morocco Western Sahara without the prior consent of the people of that territory.
"We had hoped that the Members of the European Parliament would show respect to principles of law and its own Court of Justice. We strongly condemn the Parliament's ignoring of the ECJ rulings and its clear undermining of the UN peace process. The Parliamentarians who voted for this agreement have today sent a clear signal to the wider international community and to the people of Western Sahara that democracy, human rights and rule of law is irrelevant to them", Sara Eyckmans of Western Sahara Resource Watch commented.
"What is the point of a rule based system in Europe, if the Commission and Parliament choose to simply look away from judgments of the EU's highest Court?", Eyckmans asked.
"This comes at the worst time ever, as the UN is trying to make the parties find a solution to the conflict. Why should Morocco take part in the peace talks now, as it has signed a lucrative trade deal for the territory that it illegally and brutally occupies?", Eyckmans said.
444 parliamentarians voted for the agreement. WSRW will later publish the names of these individuals who supported the illegal agreement.
The Western Sahara liberation movement Frente Polisario condemned in a press release the Parliament's decision to ignore the EU Court.
The vote today took place in two parts. Before the trade agreement itself was voted for, the Parliament had to vote on a proposal to refer the agreement for an opinion to the ECJ. 210 voted for, 414 against and 48 abstained in relation to that proposal.
For a little while, ENGIE had published on its website hints about who it had actually "consulted" when doing business in occupied Western Sahara.
The German building materials giant sides with Morocco in the Western Sahara conflict, avoiding any questions on its own legal obligations in the occupied territory.
The French company Alcatel Submarine Networks SpA, partially owned by Nokia, has laid telecom cables in occupied Western Sahara.
India and New Zealand stand out as the main importers of phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara, in WSRW’s newest annual report on the controversial trade.