The Netherlands: Western Sahara products are not Moroccan
Article image
Morocco cannot claim tariff preferences for agricultural products coming from Western Sahara on the basis of the upcoming EU-Morocco agricultural agreement, says Dutch Minister for Foreign Affairs, Uri Rosenthal.
Published 23 August 12


“The agricultural agreement between the EU and Morocco, which will enter into force this autumn, is solely applicable to the territory of Morocco. Therefore, Morocco cannot claim tariff preferences for products from Western Sahara on the basis of said agreement. The Dutch customs will monitor this”, the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs stated on behalf of his Cabinet and the Cabinet for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation.

Replying to questions from the socialist parliamentarian van Bommel (SP), the Minister further stated that the label ‘Morocco’ was indeed misguiding and that it is absolutely possible that products from Western Sahara carrying that label can be found in Dutch supermarkets. Download the Dutch statement here, or from the Dutch government webpages.

label_and_liability_cover_300.jpgThe statement is in line with other non-EU governments, such as Norway, Switzerland and the US, which all underline the obvious fact, that Western Sahara is not part of Morocco under their respective trade agreements with the Moroccan kingdom.

The WSRW report ‘Label and Liability’, published in June 2012, had already revealed that Dutch supermarket chain Albert Heijn imports cherry tomatoes from Dakhla, located in the south of occupied Western Sahara. The tomatoes are claimed to be originating from 'Morocco'.

The Netherlands do not recognize Morocco’s self-proclaimed sovereignty over Western Sahara, and the Dutch government asks companies to abstain from investing in the territory.

EU Commission backtracks on labelling Western Sahara goods

What is EU's position on labelling of products from occupied Western Sahara? The EU Commission has now for the third time published a response to a parliamentary question on the matter, but the latest version fails to address the question.

18 March 20

Why does this EU statement keep disappearing?

A clarification by the EU Commission on labelling of products from Western Sahara was published, then removed, then published again and has now been removed again from EU websites. 

21 February 20

EU reaffirms: Western Sahara products to be labelled as such

Two weeks ago, the EU Commission announced that products from Western Sahara should be labelled accordingly, only to withdraw that statement the very next day. Today, the Commission reaffirms its original position.

19 February 20

Spectacular backtracking by EU Commission on Western Sahara labelling

On 5 February 2020, the EU Commission announced that products from Western Sahara should be labelled accordingly. But about 24 hours later, all traces to that statement had been removed from EU websites.

10 February 20