EU Parliament slams Commission on Western Sahara talks

The leading Parliamentary Committee sets consent of the Saharawi people as a condition for endorsing the Western Sahara trade deal that the Commission is presently negotiating with Morocco.

Read also: WSRW demands Commission for answers regarding fake consultation in Western Sahara
Published: 27.02 - 2018 13:56Printer version    
On 20 February, the EU Commission briefed the European Parliament's International Trade Committee on the provisional outcome of its ongoing negotiations with Morocco to secure Western Sahara trade flows. This, according to the Commission, would be possible through an amendment of the existing protocols of the EU-Morocco agriculture agreement.

The Parliament has so far expressed its shock, as the Commission had finished the negotiations with Morocco over a new agreement for Western Sahara only days after briefing the parliament last time. The Court of Justice had in 2016 judged that no trade agreement could cover Western Sahara unless the representatives of the territory had consented to it.

The International Trade committee of the Parliament raised one fundamental queston: where is the consent of the people of Western Sahara?

During the meeting held on 20 February in the European Parliament, 8 out of 9 MEPs expressed their dissatisfaction, disbelief and disappointment towards the conduct of the European Commission during these negotiations.

The Chair of the INTA Committee, German Socialist MEP Bernd Lange, opened the agenda item by saying he was surprised by the marginal role to which the European legislative body has been relegated by the EU executive. “It seems there was a deal behind closed doors" Lange affirmed from the outset of the discussion.

The Commission’s debriefing to the Trade committee was marred by contradictions. To name just a few: one EU official talked about “population”, the other mentioned “the people”; the draft agreement was finalized on January 31, but EEAS Senior official Vincent Piket said that he started a dialogue with the Polisario Front in "early February".

When Mr. Piket ended his presentation, the dismay was transversal, across the political spectrum: S&D, ALDE, Greens/EFA and GUE (no EPP MEPs expressed themselves during the meeting).

The Commission explained that it had been in contact with a number of bodies and institutions with interest in Western Sahara. However, these are all Moroccan, and totally irrelevant to the Western Sahara issue.

Western Sahara Resource Watch today sent a letter to EEAS in which we ask 17 questions about the baseless consultation process, referring to the comments given by EEAS in the INTA Committee. Read all about that here.

Chair Lange continued, claiming to be "really unsatisfied" and labelled DG TAXUD's approach as "unacceptable".
Of critical importance for the forthcoming vote by the Parliament on the outcome of the negotiations, MEP Patricia Lalonde (ALDE), Standing Rapporteur on the dossier, outlined three conditions for Parliament’s approval of the deal: 1) the territorial application of the agreement to Western Sahara must be explicitly stated; 2) the agreement must be to the benefit of the local populations, notably in economic terms; 3) the people of Western Sahara must give its consent.

On the latter condition, the Rapporteur emphatically stressed the term “people” of Western Sahara and insisted that the Commission must "ensure the representability of the organisations consulted in the process”.

MEP Klaus Buchner (Greens) sought to simplify the discussion with a questions and answers session: "what did the ECJ say? The people of Western Sahara must agree. And, what is the European Commission doing? Talking to the occupying government.”  As a matter of fact, it cannot be clearer than that, continued Buchner: “the European Commission is disregarding the judgement, the rule of law and human rights, while protecting the occupiers' economic benefits”.  

It is unacceptable for MEPs that “the Commission wants Parliament to vote on something illegal”, as MEP Lola Sanchez (GUE, Spain) summarised it.

For this reason, the Belgian socialist Maria Arena proposed, "we in the INTA committee should ask the ECJ about the conformity of what the Commission negotiated. If it is in line with the verdict, we can conclude the agreement, but if it is not, then it will be ridiculous to ask to the MEPs to vote on something that is not legally valid".

All intervening MEPs critizised the Commission, with the exception of MEP Ayala Sender, who recalled that the problem of Western Sahara needs to be solved at UN level and that Europe cannot decide who the legitimate representatives are. It could be added that the UN resolution referring to Polisario as the representative is mentioned in EU the Court judgments on the matter.

As a conclusion, Mr Piket assured the parliamentarians that, "we take good note of what you [MEPs] said".

For more information watch the discussion online (from 17.25.50).

Since you're here....
WSRW’s work is being read and used more than ever. But our financial situation is tough. Our work takes time, dedication and diligence. But we do it because we believe it matters – and we hope you do to. If everyone who reads our website or likes us on Facebook, would contribute to our work – 3€, 5€, 27€ … what you can spare – the future of WSRW would be much more secure. You can donate to WSRW in less than a minute here.


21.03 - 2018 / 21.03 - 2018EU Commission dead set on fishing in Western Sahara
20.03 - 2018 / 20.03 - 2018Does OPEC consider Western Sahara to be part of Morocco?
20.03 - 2018 / 27.08 - 2010Support Western Sahara Resource Watch
06.03 - 2018 / 06.03 - 2018Kosmos Energy maintains propaganda site after Western Sahara exit
02.03 - 2018 / 01.03 - 2018What is HeidelbergCement doing in occupied Western Sahara?
01.03 - 2018 / 01.03 - 2018Confirmed: Innophos key client of Western Sahara phosphate rock
28.02 - 2018 / 28.02 - 2018South Africa stands up against the plunder of Western Sahara
28.02 - 2018 / 28.02 - 2018Bermuda shipping company drops Western Sahara
27.02 - 2018 / 27.02 - 2018EU and Morocco announce continued fisheries partnership
27.02 - 2018 / 23.02 - 2018EU Parliament slams Commission on Western Sahara talks
27.02 - 2018 / 27.02 - 2018Polisario: open to negotiate Western Sahara deals with the EU
27.02 - 2018 / 27.02 - 2018Saharawi refugees celebrate EU Court victory
27.02 - 2018 / 27.02 - 2018BREAKING: EU Court stops EU-Morocco fish deal in Western Sahara
23.02 - 2018 / 23.02 - 2018SA Court confirms: Morocco has no ownership over Saharawi phoshates
23.02 - 2018 / 21.02 - 2018EU Member States disagree over toxic fertilizers
21.02 - 2018 / 21.02 - 2018Vigeo Eiris goes back on false claim
20.02 - 2018 / 20.02 - 2018EU Parliamentarians concerned over Commission's respect of rule of law
15.02 - 2018 / 15.02 - 2018Sweden to vote against new EU-Morocco fish talks
08.02 - 2018 / 08.02 - 2018Studies continue on Kosmos Energy's block
07.02 - 2018 / 07.02 - 2018Kosmos and Cairn have pulled out of Western Sahara


Morocco occupies the major part of its neighbouring country, Western Sahara. Entering into business deals with Moroccan companies or authorities in the occupied territories gives an impression of political legitimacy to the occupation. It also gives job opportunities to Moroccan settlers and income to the Moroccan government. Western Sahara Resource Watch demands foreign companies leave Western Sahara until a solution to the conflict is found.
EU Court cases on Western Sahara for dummies


It's not easy keeping up with all the different legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara. For the sake of clarity, here's an overview of the three different cases at the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Stand up for the Gdeim Izik 25!


Leading activists from Western Sahara are condemned to sentences ranging from 20 years to life imprisonment in connection to a mass protest in 2010 denouncing the Saharawi people’s social and economic marginalization in their occupied land; the Gdeim Izik protest camp.
Support Western Sahara Resource Watch


Help us to protect the natural resources of Western Sahara for the Saharawi people. Support our work by making a donation.
Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder


At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents. News Archive 2018 News Archive 2017 News Archive 2016 News Archive 2015 News Archive 2014 News Archive 2013 News Archive 2012 News Archive 2011 News Archive 2010 News Archive 2009 News Archive 2008 News Archive 2007 News Archive 2004-2006

Register for our English newsletter:

These web pages have been built with the financial support of the trade union Industry Energy