8 Swiss parliamentarians protest ethics of Tasmanian company
Article image

This afternoon, a bulk vessel is set to arrive port of Risdon, Hobart, Tasmania, with phosphate rock plundered from occupied Western Sahara. 8 Swiss parliamentarians protest the continued imports.

Published 09 September 2010

Press release – for immediate release
10 September 2010 (Australian time)

This afternoon, a bulk vessel is set to arrive port of Risdon, Hobart, Tasmania, with phosphate rock plundered from occupied Western Sahara.

The trade to Tasmania takes place in violation of international law, and contributes to prolong one of the longest running conflicts in Africa. The cargo will be on board the vessel ‘Christine O’.

The vessel contains phosphate rock that Morocco is exporting from Western Sahara – a territory which was occupied by Moroccan forces in 1975. UN has stated that the exploitation of such resources cannot take place unless the people of the territory has been consulted, something which they have not been. Western Sahara is treated as a colony by the UN.

The importer, Impact Fertilisers, has admitted to carry out such imports. Since earlier this year, Impact is majority owned by the Swiss firm Ameropa. Last week, 8 Swiss parliamentarians urged Ameropa to instruct its Tasmanian subsidiary to halt the imports.

"By taking part in the trade of phosphates from occupied Western Sahara, your subsidiary, Impact Fertilisers is profiting from the illegal occupation of the territory and abuses the law. This contributes to undermine the efforts of the United Nations for a peaceful solution to the conflict”, wrote the parliamentarians.

The group referred to among other the world’s biggest fertiliser firm Yara, announcing that it would not import from Western Sahara as long as the conflict is ongoing.

“We ask you as a business conscious of its responsibilities, to take the regional geopolitical context into consideration and to ask your subsidiary, Impact Fertilisers based in Tasmania to abandon the importations of phosphates from Western Sahara so long as the people concerned are not able to exercise their legitimate rights over their own natural resources”, stated the 8 parliamentarians.

Read the whole letter from the Swiss parliamentarians here:
http://wsrw.org/files/dated/2010-09-09/ameropa_letter_english_02.09.2010.pdf

Monday this week, Saharawis in the occupied territories again protested the Moroccan plunder of the phosphate resources from their land.

Christine O carries Antigua & Bermuda flag, and is managed by Opielok Reederei, Germany.

For questions or comments, or pictures of the Saharawi demonstrations in Western Sahara: 

Cate Lewis, Australia
Australian Western Sahara Association.
cate@wsrw.org 

Emmanuel Martinoli, Switzerland
Association de soutien à un référendum libre et régulier au Sahara Occidental
arso@arso.org

Axel Goldau, Germany
axel@wsrw.org 

 

One of the richest coastlines in the world

The fish stocks of occupied Western Sahara have not only attracted the interest of the Moroccan fleet: other foreign interests are also fishing in the occupied waters through arrangements with Moroccan counterparts. Along the Western Saharan coastline, a processing industry has emerged.

11 May 2026

The CJEU Court Cases

Keeping track of the many legal proceedings relating to Western Sahara is not easy. This page offers an overview of the cases concerning the territory that have been before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

08 May 2026

Tūhana human rights advisors ignore human rights

A consultancy hired to assess phosphate imports from occupied Western Sahara into New Zealand concludes there is no problem. 

29 April 2026

MEPs push back on Commission over Western Sahara in EU–Morocco trade

MEPs from across the political spectrum sharply criticised the European Commission over its handling of EU-Morocco trade relations covering occupied Western Sahara, raising concerns over legality, transparency and an apparent disregard for Parliament’s role.

19 March 2026