New report reveals the companies transporting conflict phosphate rock
Article image

A new report published by WSRW today reveals the names of around 100 shipping companies behind the transport of phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara in 2016 and 2017.

Published 16 June 2017

For 45 days now, the large motor vessel NM Cherry Blossom has been detained in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. On 15 June 2017, the High Court in the country found that the ship, carrying conflict minerals from occupied Western Sahara, is to remain there until a trial concludes on the real ownership of the cargo. 

Which shipping company could be the next in having a vessel detained? 

Western Sahara Resource Watch (WSRW) today launches the first ever report to systematically outline the owners and operators of the vessels that transport the controversial phosphate to clients overseas. The export is done by Morocco, the occupying power. The report’s annex refers to around 100 shipping companies that took part in such transports from the territory from 1 January 2016 to 9 June 2017. 

Download the 36-page report 'Carriers of Conflict' here (pdf). 

The operator which is most heavily involved in the trade is Ultrabulk A/S from Denmark, accounting for 8 of 46 shipments during the period. 13 of the 46 vessels mentioned in the report are Greek owned or operated. 

A key player in the overall trade, and with an important stake in the shipment currently detained in South Africa, is the German/UK company Furness Withy, until 2017 part of the frozen pizza conglomerate of Dr. Oetker. From later this year, the company is to be sold to Maersk in Denmark. 

Concerns have been expressed by governments, parties, trade unions and organisations internationally regarding the global purchases of such rock from the Moroccan government. Institutional investors have blacklisted the importers for contributing to undermine international law and the UN peace process , while several fertilizer companies have halted the imports after being aware of the controversy. But little focus have in the past been given to the transporters. 

"With the current legal processes against the shipments, all transporters need to beware of the risks involved in participation of this pillage", Morten Nielsen, board member of Western Sahara Resource Watch, explained. 

Western Sahara is treated by the United Nations as the last unresolved colonial question in Africa. Parts of the territory, including the phosphate mine, is under partial Moroccan occupation. WSRW calls on all companies involved to immediately halt all shipments of Western Sahara phosphates until a solution to the conflict has been found. 

Most operators mentioned in this report were contacted yesterday for comments. Answers that we receive can be found here. Further information about the role of clients of the rock can be found in the WSRW report “P for Plunder 2016”. 
 

Importer in Brazil stops conflict rock purchases

The Chinese company China Molybdenum - which imported phosphate rock to its subsidiary in Brazil - will no longer purchase phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara. 

14 October 2021

Siemens Gamesa insists that occupied Western Sahara is Morocco

The Spanish company today, yet again, refers to the territory as part of Morocco.

07 October 2021

Report: Morocco uses green energy to embellish its occupation

By 2030, half of Morocco's wind energy production could be generated illegally in occupied Western Sahara. Yet, Morocco presents itself as best-in-class on the energy transition. 

06 October 2021

Enel failed the test

The Italian company Enel is one of the firms that have taken the exact same approach as the EU when carrying out ‘stakeholder consultations' in Western Sahara - a procedure now found invalid by the EU Court of Justice. 

05 October 2021