From the end of this year, 2 of 3 global importers of Western Sahara's controversial conflict minerals are from New Zealand. This week, locals protested in the city of Dunedin.
A local environmental organisation in Dunedin, New Zealand, this weekend protested the arrival of a bulk vessel entering the port, loaded with phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara.
In the background of the photos, one can spot the vessel 'Triton Valk', just having arrived the port. The importer of the cargo is the fertilizer company Ravensdown.
“The occupation is pretty brutal” said Rose Murphy, spokesperson for Environmental Justice Ōtepoti, who were behind the protest , “I think the people of Dunedin would be horrified to know that a local business is funding such an injustice", she said.
Ms. Murphy stated that their group supports the right to self determination of the Saharawi people. "Ravensdown and Ballance should stop dealing in Blood Phosphate until they get a referendum for their independence", she said.
Last year a ship carrying phosphates destined for New Zealand was detained in South Africa as their courts ruled that the cargo was stolen from the people of Western Sahara.
The people of Western Sahara are calling for Ravensdown LTD and Ballance Agri-Nutrients to “stop stealing their future”. The two New Zealand fertilizer cooperatives are the last two companies that still import from the occupied territory apart from one Indian company partially owned by the Moroccan royal family.
All other previous importers globally have stopped purchasing from the controversial mine. The trade of the mineral from 2017 is reported in the WSRW report P for Plunder 2017, published in April 2018.
The Saharawi government has asked Ravensdown compensation for the goods, which the fertilizer cooperative had purchased from Morocco, the occupier.
The group owner of Triton Valk is Sumitomo Corp from Japan, while ship manager and operator is Triton Navigation BV from Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The legal advisory firm Global Diligence, which presents itself as expert on ‘heightened due diligence’, misrepresents international law in occupied Western Sahara.
In a hearing at the European Parliament earlier this week, lawmakers expressed outrage at how the Commission sidestepped them to push through a new agreement covering occupied Western Sahara, in violation of EU Court rulings.
As EU ambassadors give their green light to a new Morocco trade deal, the public is still denied access to the very agreement they are voting on - a striking case of secrecy in Brussels.
A wave of reactions is rippling across Europe following the news that the EU is moving ahead with a new trade agreement in occupied Western Sahara. The vote is scheduled for tomorrow.