Call for stringent monitoring of Morocco deal

AN MEP today voiced his reservations over the outcome of a controversial Euro vote., 16 May 2006.

Published 16 May 2006
16 May 2006.

AN MEP today voiced his reservations over the outcome of a controversial Euro vote.

Responding to today's vote in the European Parliament to approve a fisheries agreement between the EU and Morocco, Scottish National Party President and MEP Ian Hudghton expressed his disappointment with the outcome and called for strict monitoring to ensure Morocco complies with its obligations.

Mr Hudghton joined other MEPs who voted to reject the inclusion of Western Saharan waters in the agreement. Western Sahara is under Moroccan occupation and there are fears that the fisheries agreement could undermine moves to reach a negotiated settlement to the decades long dispute. Under the terms of the agreement the European Union will make an annual contribution of some twenty five million pounds to Morocco in return for access to its waters.

Speaking from Strasbourg following the vote, Mr Hudghton - a member of the Parliament's Fisheries Committee - said:

"Whilst I'm disappointed with the outcome of this vote, it doesn't let the EU off the hook in terms of its duty to the people of Western Sahara. We were at least able to include a clause which allows the agreement to be suspended if international obligations are contravened and I call upon the European Commission to stringently monitor the agreement's implementation.

"My major concern remains the potential for exploitation of Western Sahara's natural resources - resources that rightly belong to a long oppressed people who deserve our help and support. We must back international efforts to enable the Saharawi people to determine their own future and it should be up to them to decide how best to harness their natural resources."

Speaking during the debate in Parliament, Mr Hudghton said:

"Over the years I have become increasingly sceptical about the value of fisheries agreements between the EU and Third Countries. Usually only a few member states benefit, while all EU taxpayers foot the bill - and I am not confident that EU authorities can adequately monitor fishing activity or can guarantee that the money we pay ends up where it should.

"This particular agreement has an added dimension. The absolute right of a people to self-determination. The right of the Saharawi people to control their own resources. We should not be signing up to any deal with Morocco which leaves in any doubt whether Western Sahara waters can be controlled by the Moroccan government."

Here is the EU Council's legal advice on fishing in occupied waters

Before voting on the new EU-Morocco fish deal in 2018, extending into occupied Western Sahara, several EU Member States asked for legal advice that would determine their vote. WSRW today publishes that influential legal opinion, which appears to miss the ball entirely.
05 March 2020

Hans Corell criticizes EU fisheries in Western Sahara

The former Legal Counsel to the UN Security Counsel, Mr. Hans Corell, comments on the EU's fisheries activities in Western Sahara.

20 November 2019

EU Court reaffirms position on Western Sahara

Polisario has a case, but it should be pursued when the time is right, Court implies.

28 February 2019

European Parliament disregards Court and adopts Morocco fish deal

Notwithstanding four consecutive rulings of the EU's highest Court calling such a practice illegal, the European Parliament has just now voted in favour of the EU-Morocco Fisheries Agreement that will be applied to the waters of occupied Western Sahara.

12 February 2019