In a letter to the company of 19 June 2012, WSRW argues that Siemens’ involvement in the project is a matter of grave importance that “goes to the question of corporate involvement that would entrench Morocco’s presence in Western Sahara, perpetuating the conflict over the territory and further delaying the Saharawi people’s right to exercise self-determination.”

Siemens had by then stated to WSRW that the project “does not infringe the right of self-determination or any other human right in public international law”. 

“With delivering technology to this project, Siemens does not intend to make a political statement on the status of the region”, the company wrote in a letter to WSRW dated 8 May 2012. The company's request came as a response to an earlier, and yet unpublished letter, from WSRW to Siemens.

Yet, despite their efforts to be unpolitical, Siemens fails on its webpages to recognise that the location of the controversial project is not in Morocco, but in the Western Saharan territories occupied by Morocco since 1975. The German company's webpages thus constitute a strong political statement in disregard of the opinion of both the UN and of the Government of Germany, which do not recognise Morocco's self-proclaimed sovereignty over its southern neighbour.

Siemens claims that the windfarm project “bears a number of very positive effects regarding sustainable power production as well as the development of the region of West Sahara and the situation of the local population”.

A Project Design Document submitted as part of a request for UN funding by NAREVA holding presents the Foum el Oued project as part of an ongoing intensification of the exploitation of the occupied territory's natural resources, involving an increase in activity by Moroccan firms, supported by the Moroccan government. The Document states that the Wind Farm is to supply electricity to both private and publicly owned companies.

Due to the Moroccan government's policy of creating economic incentives to attract Moroccans to the illegally held territory, the 'local population' currently inhabiting Western Sahara is two to one Moroccan. The economic marginalization of the Saharawi people will result for them in an even smaller share of any economic benefit that would ensue. The Saharawi population living in Algerian refugee camps will not benefit at all.

WSRW in its first letter in March questioned how such a supply and on-the-ground technical support would be consistent with the company’s adherence to the UN Global Compact Initiative, which asks firms to support 10 principles in the areas of human rights, labour, the environment and anti-corruption “within their sphere of influence”. 

Siemens has yet to publicly address these questions to their interpretation of their participation in Global Compact.

In January this year, Siemens AG announced its plans to supply the necessary material and technical know-how to the Moroccan company NAREVA for the construction of a wind park near El Aaiun, capital of occupied Western Sahara. The NAREVA holding is said to belong to the King of Morocco, Mohammed VI.