Isle of Man shipping company exits Western Sahara until settlement
Article image

The Isle of Man shipping company LT Ugland stated to media today that it will not undertake further shipments from Western Sahara to New Zealand.

Published 20 June 17

Above: The vessel Molly Manx (IMO 9425863) is seen discharging phosphate rock at the port of Napier, New Zealand, in August 2016. The vessel is owned and operated by the UK/Isle of Man company LT Ugland Shipping Group.

Western Sahara Resource Watch last week published the report 'Carriers of Conflict' outlining all companies operating and owning the vessels transporting phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara. The industry gives the Moroccan government over USD 200 million income annually, according to WSRW’s estimates. 

One of the companies mentioned is the Isle of Man headquartered bulk shipping company LT Ugland. Today it commented on its involvement for the first time.

«In the future we will exclude Western Sahara from those areas from which want to make shipments. We will not undertake more transports from there until the issue has been settled”, Mr. Lars T. Ugland, chairman of LT Ugland, told the Norwegian business newspaper Finansavisen on 20 June 2017.

Last year, the company's vessel Molly Manx, shipped an estimated 54,000 tonnes of phosphate rock to New Zealand fertilizer producing company Ravensdown. It is one of the 46 vessels named in the WSRW report last week. 

The issue of fertilizer exports from the occupied territory has over the course of the last month reached international media, as a vessel is currently detained in South Africa, where it stopped to refuel on the way to New Zealand. NM Cherry Blossom has today been detained for 50 days, and a trial to decide the ownership of the conflict mineral is to start later this year. 

Also the Norwegian shipping company Belships today expressed that it had ended up in a transport from Western Sahara really without it intending it. In June 2016, the Ultrabulk vessel Ultra Rocanville shipped phosphates from the territory to Agrium in Canada. Ultrabulk was the commercial manager, while Belships had the technical part. 

“As a technical manager, we are totally in the backseat when it comes to commercial decisions. Our responsibility is limited to crewing, maintenance, class contact etc”, CEO of Belships ASA, Mr. Ulrich Müller explained to Finansavisen. 

“Bulk vessels under our commercial management have never called in Western Sahara. We have no intention to make such calls in the future, and we will to the best of our ability follow the advice from the [Norwegian] government”, he told. 

In the middle of June, WSRW wrote to most of the operators of the vessels involved in the shipments, including to LT Ugland. Find those letters, and responses to them, here.

 

Report reveals clients of Western Sahara’s conflict mineral

India and New Zealand stand out as the main importers of phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara, in WSRW’s newest annual report on the controversial trade. 

13 April 21

These are the questions that Siemens will not answer

At its Annual General Meeting, Siemens Gamesa was as evasive as ever with regard to core questions about the company's involvement in occupied Western Sahara.

01 April 21

Shipping company responses to the report P for Plunder 2020

The WSRW report P for Plunder 2021 to be published in April 2021 will contain information on all 22 vessels that departed occupied Western Sahara from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020.

22 March 21

Will thyssenkrupp do further business in Western Sahara?

The German industrial engineering giant is unclear whether it will steer away from future projects in occupied Western Sahara. 

17 March 21