Sweden was the only EU Member State to issue a critical statement with regard to the granting of the negotiation mandate. Read that statement below.
“Sweden supports the recommendation for a Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations on the adaptation of protocols to the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco, since the Council decision and its annex clearly state that a future agreement between the European Council and the Kingdom of Morocco should be in line with the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Case C-104/16 P.
Sweden has taken good note of the statement made by the CLS that the mandate is in line with the judgment. Sweden looks forward to the information and reports, which are to be provided by the Commission to Member States through the Council Mashreq/Maghreb Working Party in order to monitor the progress and outcome of the negotiations.
Sweden notes that the Commission shall assess the potential implications of the agreement for sustainable development, in particular as regards the benefits for the people concerned.
Under international law the people of Western Sahara enjoys the right to self-determination. The abovementioned judgment of the European Court of Justice states that an agreement with Morocco covering the territory of Western Sahara must receive the consent of the people of Western Sahara. Sweden understands that the use of “people concerned” in the Council decision’s annex refers to “the people of Western Sahara” in line with the judgment.
Sweden’s support for a future agreement is dependent on that such an agreement fully respects international law, including the said judgment.”
EU Parliament to hold Western Sahara debates at committee level?
The European Parliament has expressed itself in favour of holding debates in three parliament committees about the exclusion of Western Sahara from EU-Morocco trade agreements.
EU Commission backtracks on labelling Western Sahara goods
What is EU's position on labelling of products from occupied Western Sahara? The EU Commission has now for the third time published a response to a parliamentary question on the matter, but the latest version fails to address the question.
Why does this EU statement keep disappearing?
A clarification by the EU Commission on labelling of products from Western Sahara was published, then removed, then published again and has now been removed again from EU websites.
EU reaffirms: Western Sahara products to be labelled as such
Two weeks ago, the EU Commission announced that products from Western Sahara should be labelled accordingly, only to withdraw that statement the very next day. Today, the Commission reaffirms its original position.