On 5 February 2020, the EU Commission announced that products from Western Sahara should be labelled accordingly. But about 24 hours later, all traces to that statement had been removed from EU websites.
"All imported products, including those originating from the Western Sahara, need to comply with the relevant legislation, including the requirement to provide accurate and not misleading information on the country of origin or provenance of those products, which in such case must thus be “Western Sahara”. That is the answer EU Commissioner for Agriculture Janusz Wojciechowski gave on 5 February 2020 to a question in the European Parliament.
This answer was published on the website of the European Parliament, as is standard procedure when Parliamentary Questions are responded to. But one day later, the Commission's statement had been removed from that website.
The parliamentary question that had lead to the answer, presented by MEP Heidi Hautala (Finland, Greens/EFA) on 11 December 2020, can still be found on the Parliament's website (with reference code P-004368/2019) . The question concerned the labeling of origin on products coming from Western Sahara and whether Morocco's conformity checks on these products are in line with relevant EU Regulations - particularly in view of rulings by the EU Court of Justice establishing that Morocco has no sovereignty or jurisdiction over Western Sahara. The icon displayed at the right top corner of the page - a document with caption "answer in writing" - indicates that the question has been answered and can be accessed through clicking that particular icon (see photo to the right).
But the page containing the answer that Commissioner Wojciechowski had given on behalf of the EU Commission as a whole, has been taken down. Instead, visitors of the page get a disclaimer saying "The internet adress (url) you wanted to consult does not exist" (see screenshot above).
MEP Hautala has however preserved a copy of the Commission's answer to her PQ - with that very same reference code P-004368/2019, which the Commission's written answer refers to - on her personal webpage. [Or download the document here].
"Why this bizarre chain of events, I cannot fathom. This is really unprecedented, particularly for an official reply to the Parliament from the highest level of the Commission. Apparently, a new, presumably “correct” response will be provided by the Commission in due course. I look forward to seeing how it will differ from the initial response", MEP Hautala states.
When the Commission's statement on correct labelling of origin of products from Western Sahara was first published, EU media referred to it as a "blow for Morocco". "The European Commission on Wednesday said products originating from the Western Sahara must be labelled as such, in a move likely to stoke a backlash from Morocco, which annexed the territory", EU Observer wrote.
Given Rabat's sensitivity on the issue - it has frozen its relations with the EU over Western Sahara before - such a backlash may very well be behind this inexplicable backpedalling.
The French company Alcatel Submarine Networks SpA, partially owned by Nokia, has laid telecom cables in occupied Western Sahara.
India and New Zealand stand out as the main importers of phosphate rock from occupied Western Sahara, in WSRW’s newest annual report on the controversial trade.
At its Annual General Meeting, Siemens Gamesa was as evasive as ever with regard to core questions about the company's involvement in occupied Western Sahara.
The WSRW report P for Plunder 2021 to be published in April 2021 will contain information on all 22 vessels that departed occupied Western Sahara from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2020.