Enel failed the test
615ae0f91ad88_Motril_3000

The Italian company Enel is one of the firms that have taken the exact same approach as the EU when carrying out ‘stakeholder consultations' in Western Sahara - a procedure now found invalid by the EU Court of Justice. 

05 October 2021

Western Sahara Resource Watch is on 6 October 2021 launching a report on Morocco's renewable energy projects in occupied Western Sahara. The report will address Siemens' and Enel's operations.

Photo above: Siemens Gamesa has from July 2021 supplied Enel with equipment for its large Boujdour wind park.The picture is from Motril, Spain.  

The EU Court of Justice ruled on 29 September 2021 that the EU's approach to Western Sahara has been illegal. In decomposing that approach, the ruling shows clearly how fundamentally flawed the position of Italian company Enel is in relation to the territory. 

As Western Sahara Resource Watch has covered before, the EU institutions have deliberately ignored previous rulings from the EU Court, which stated that the consent of the people of Western Sahara is a prerequisite for the legality of trade or fish activities in the territory. 

Instead of seeking that consent, the Union carried out a ‘stakeholder consultation’ to assess the alleged 'benefits' to the population in the territory - which are primarily Moroccan settlers. The exercise was done in collaboration with the EU's Moroccan counterparts. 

As such, the Union only met with groups and individuals that defend the Moroccan position to the conflict, such as Moroccan parliamentarians, NGOs, business groups, government institutions etc. No effort was made to obtain permission to operate on the land from the Saharawis. 

On 29 September, the EU Court of Justice concluded such an approach to be totally irrelevant and insufficient, stressing that a 'consultation' on 'benefits' cannot substitute the consent of the people of Western Sahara - through their UN recognised representation, Polisario. 

EU Court of Justice, press release, 29 Sept 2021

 

This ruling should be particularly relevant and important for companies that have copied the EU's faulty approach. 

The most important of these is Enel, which is involved in the construction of energy projects in Western Sahara, and has over the last years engaged in similar ‘impact assessments’ or ‘consultations’. Enel was excluded from the portfolios of Norway's biggest private asset manager earlier this year, as it acts against the right to self-determination of the Saharawis. 

Enel is the company most heavily involved in construction of Moroccan energy projects in occupied Western Sahara. In a letter to WSRW only two weeks before the ruling (screenshot below), Enel described an approach that is basically identical to the EU's. Enel failed to respond to questions from WSRW as to how it could have obtained permission to operate on the land. 

Enel, letter to WSRW, 13 September 2021. 
WSRW wrote to Enel on 03.07.2013, 27.09.2016, 11.10.2016, 02.06.2020, 03.09.2021 and received weak responses on 10.10.2016, 30.06.2020 and 13.09.2021. Enel's responses consistently refers to the irrelevant argument of alleged ‘benefits’.

 

In addition, the companies ENGIE and ACWA Power have taken similar approaches. Most recently, ENGIE in 2021 contracted the company Global Diligence to undertake a secretive ‘consultation’ with alleged ‘stakeholders’. WSRW and the French association APSO wrote the company on 11.01.2019 and on 09.12.2020. ENGIE responded on 13.04.2021. WSRW sent a follow-up letter on 17.05.2021, which was not responded to.

ACWA Power allegedly also base their assessment on such studies with a consultation component. WSRW wrote to ACWA on 29.11.2016 and on 05.06.2020. No response was received.

Siemens only addresses aspect of 'benefits' but without ever mentioning the Saharawi people's right to consent. WSRW wrote Siemens AG and its affiliated companies Siemens Energy and Gamesa on 06.03.2012, 19.06.2012, 03.07.2013, 26.09.2016, 07.12.2017, 01.10.2018 and 18.02.2021 regarding the right to consent. The companies failed to respond to that aspect in their letters of 10.05.2012, 10.10.2016, 08.01.2018, 16.11.2018, 24.04.2020, 23.03.2021 and 07.04.2021

The commonalities of the consultation ‘studies’ undertaken by the involved companies in Western Sahara are these: 

  • None of the companies have obtained consent from the Saharawi people, neither for the business agreement nor for commissioning third party firms to carry out consultation exercises.
  • None of the assessments are public, nor are their terms of reference.
  • Clarifications cannot be obtained from the contracted third-party consultancy agencies, who are usually not even known. The one used by Enel is not known to anyone, whereas the one used by ENGIE - Global Diligence - does not want to answer detailed questions regarding methodology.
  • WSRW is not aware of a single Saharawi group or individual advocating self-determination, including the UN-recognised representation Polisario, to have ever taken part in such alleged consultations.
  • WSRW is not aware of any of the consultation processes or impact studies taking into account the legal status of the territory, the legal status of the Moroccan presence on the territory, the legal rights of the Saharawi people nor the legal validity of the commercial operation they are about to assist in.
  • All studies allegedly mention 'local benefits', which is irrelevant in the eyes of the EU Court.

Report: Morocco uses green energy to embellish its occupation

By 2030, half of Morocco's wind energy production could be generated illegally in occupied Western Sahara. Yet, Morocco presents itself as best-in-class on the energy transition. 

06 October 2021

Moroccan king's "green" company silent on human rights

Nareva, the wind company of the King of Morocco, fails to answer questions on human rights by the international Business and Human Rights Center, in a study published yesterday.

04 November 2016

Report: Moroccan green energy used for plunder

At COP22, beware of what you read about Morocco’s renewable energy efforts. An increasing part of the projects take place in the occupied territory of Western Sahara and is used for mineral plunder, new WSRW report documents.

02 November 2016

Siemens and Enel to construct wind farms on occupied land

Danish-German Siemens Wind Power and Italian Enel Green Power have won the tender to construct five wind farms in Morocco. Only, two of planned farms are located outside of Morocco, and inside occupied Western Sahara. WSRW had warned them from taking part in the tender.

15 December 2015